The four plaintiffs are granted legal aid

In its decision on the legal aid, the court considered the financial situation of the four plaintiffs and the prospects for the lawsuit. It concluded that the plaintiffs are legally "lacking of means" and that their case does not seem devoid of any chances of success. Therefore, they are entitled to legal aid. This decision confirms the human rights entitlement to access to an independent court in Switzerland for people from the Global South. 

Holcim had opposed the granting of legal aid but was defeated in its argumentation. The court expressly did not follow Holcim's view that the legal claims were devoid of any chances of success. The court held, amongst others, that it is irrelevant that there are other companies besides Holcim which the plaintiffs could sue on the same grounds. The plaintiffs are free to decide whom they want to sue, even if other parties - jointly and severally liable - could be considered. 

Meanwhile, the civil action of the four Indonesians against the Swiss cement manufacturer continues. They are demanding compensation for climate damages they have suffered, a financial contribution to flood–protection measures, as well as the rapid reduction of Holcim’s CO2 emissions. Swiss Church Aid HEKS/EPER, the European Centre for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR), and the Indonesian environmental organization WALHI are supporting the demands of the plaintiffs with the campaign “Call for Climate Justice.”